首页> 外文OA文献 >Prospective Comparison of the Diagnostic Potential of Real-Time PCR, Double-Sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Galactomannan, and a (1→3)-β-d-Glucan Test in Weekly Screening for Invasive Aspergillosis in Patients with Hematological Disorders
【2h】

Prospective Comparison of the Diagnostic Potential of Real-Time PCR, Double-Sandwich Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Galactomannan, and a (1→3)-β-d-Glucan Test in Weekly Screening for Invasive Aspergillosis in Patients with Hematological Disorders

机译:实时PCR,双夹心酶联免疫吸附法检测半乳甘露聚糖和每周(1→3)-β-d-葡聚糖检测在血液病患者侵袭性曲霉病筛查中的诊断潜力的前瞻性比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The establishment of an optimal noninvasive method for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis (IA) is needed to improve the management of this life-threatening infection in patients with hematological disorders, and a number of noninvasive tests for IA that target different fungal components, including galactomannan, (1→3)-β-d-glucan (BDG), and Aspergillus DNA, have been developed. In this study, we prospectively evaluated the diagnostic potential of three noninvasive tests for IA that were used in a weekly screening strategy: the double-sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for galactomannan (Platelia Aspergillus), a real-time PCR assay for Aspergillus DNA (GeniQ-Asper), and an assay for BDG (β-glucan Wako). We analyzed 149 consecutive treatment episodes in 96 patients with hematological disorders who were at high risk for IA and diagnosed 9 proven IA cases, 2 probable IA cases, and 13 possible invasive fugal infections. In a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the ROC curve was greatest for ELISA, using two consecutive positive results (0.97; P = 0.036 for ELISA versus PCR, P = 0.055 for ELISA versus BDG). Based on the ROC curve, the cutoff for the ELISA could be reduced to an optical density index (O.D.I.) of 0.6. With the use of this cutoff for ELISA and cutoffs for PCR and BDG that give a comparable level of specificity, the sensitivity/specificity/positive predictive value/negative predictive value of the ELISA and the PCR and BDG tests were 1.00/0.93/0.55/1.00, 0.55/0.93/0.40/0.96, and 0.55/0.93/0.40/0.96, respectively. In conclusion, among these weekly screening tests for IA, the double-sandwich ELISA test was the most sensitive at predicting the diagnosis of IA in high-risk patients with hematological disorders, using a reduced cutoff of 0.6 O.D.I.
机译:需要建立一种最佳的非侵入性方法来诊断侵袭性曲霉病(IA),以改善血液疾病患者这种威胁生命的感染的管理,并针对多种针对不同真菌成分(包括半乳甘露聚糖)的IA进行非侵入性测试,(已经开发出1→3)-β-d-葡聚糖(BDG)和曲霉DNA。在这项研究中,我们前瞻性评估了每周筛查策略中使用的三种无创性IA诊断方法的诊断潜力:半三明治甘露聚糖(Platelia Aspergillus)的双夹心酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),实时PCR测定用于曲霉DNA(GeniQ-Asper)和BDG(β-葡聚糖Wako)的分析。我们分析了96例具有高IA风险的血液系统疾病患者的149次连续治疗发作,并诊断出9例确诊的IA病例,2例可能的IA病例和13例可能的浸润性真菌感染。在接受者操作特征(ROC)分析中,ROC曲线下的面积对于ELISA最大,使用了两个连续的阳性结果(0.97; ELISA对PCR的P = 0.036,ELISA对BDG的P = 0.055)。根据ROC曲线,可将ELISA的截止值降低至0.6的光密度指数(O.D.I.)。使用此临界值用于ELISA以及使用PCR和BDG的临界值可提供相当的特异性,ELISA,PCR和BDG检测的灵敏度/特异性/阳性预测值/阴性预测值分别为1.00 / 0.93 / 0.55 /分别为1.00、0.55 / 0.93 / 0.40 / 0.96和0.55 / 0.93 / 0.40 / 0.96。总而言之,在这些每周一次的IA筛查测试中,双夹心ELISA试验对于降低高危血液病患者的IA诊断最敏感,降低了0.6 O.D.I.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号